Headers & Volleys

November 20, 2009

“This is the end”… or at least it should be

On the day Brawn GP’s intention to tempt seven-time Formula One world champion Michael Schumacher out of retirement was revealed, the wisdom of great sportsmen to reach out and dust off those old gloves, those boots or, indeed, that helmet which accompanied such adulation and success in their prime, must surely be questioned.

Earlier this year the media frenzy surrounding Schumacher’s near-return for Ferrari, in place of the injured Felipe Massa after the latter’s career-threatening crash at the Hungarian Grand Prix, generated such hype and fervour that few could argue against the marketability of the racing legend. A back injury sustained in a prior motorcycle accident put paid to the return, however the status of one of sports true modern greats was apparently reaffirmed and duly noted by German motoring giant Mercedes and Schumacher’s long-time collaborator at Benetton and Ferrari, Ross Brawn. Jenson Button’s departure to create a back-to-back world championship dream team with Lewis Hamilton at McLaren has left a void which Schumacher appears ready to fill. The question this poses is not, however, Schumacher’s driving ability or appeal. Even at the ripe old age of 40, Schumacher’s skill and nous behind the wheel would be more than the equal of many a younger driver. Instead, it is one of legacy, sporting mythology and bowing out through choice, not necessity.

Muhammed Ali is possibly the best known and relevant example of a sporting great continuing a career past such a time where the stratospheric standards set by a total dominance of their given medium, simply cannot be achieved. In his final fights, Ali lost to such fighters as Larry Holmes and Trevor Berbick, pugilists of some talent yet not of the same calibre as a Liston, a Frazier, a Foreman – all of whom simply could not live with the ‘Greatest of All Time’. We now see a man ravaged by Parkinsons Disease, by general consensus the result of not heeding medical advice and retiring before it was too late. Within boxing a trend appears to form whereby men who have spent their lives in the gym and in the ring, seem reluctant, if not afraid, to admit their time is up.

A notable exception to this rule comes in the form of Joe Calzaghe. Retiring after defeating all comers in a career spanning 46 fights, producing 46 wins with 32 by way of knock-out, Calzaghe bowed out a true champion making no noises (thus far) of any possible return between the ropes. Calzaghe, for me, is one of boxing’s great champions, one to rival such middleweight idols as Hagler, Leonard and Hearns. My view of him is enhanced by not seeing him, aged and failing to live up to his younger self, climbing into a ring to kickstart the career of a younger fighter such as Carl Froch. A contemporary of Calzaghe’s, Ricky Hatton, appears not to be aware of making the same mistakes as many a brawler before him, this week declaring (whilst looking incredibly bloated and unwell) his desire and “hunger” to return. We can only hope his decision does not return to haunt him in years to come.

Footballers have often resisted the temptation to continue past their peak with such luminaries of the game as Michel Platini, Eric Cantona and George Best retiring from the game, somewhat unexpectedly, in what many perceived to be the midst of the most productive and impressive years of their careers. Best, of course, made an ill-fated return with Fulham in 1976 after retiring from Manchester United in ‘74 and, having lost the pace for which he was once revered, lasted barely a year before shipping off to the money in the newly formed North American Soccer League. These players, Cantona especially having featured heavily in my football-watching lifetime, with early retirement seem to adopt an almost impenetrable aura which inflates the sense of champion they acquired as players. I’m reminded of the goals he scored, the sheer audacity of his nonchalant control and effortless lobs from outside of the box, with even his notorious kung-fu kick on a neanderthol at Crystal Palace seemingly adding to the mystique of the man. I do not remember him, being substituted at half time in a make-or-break match for being off the pace, old, or out of shape.

The common factor between Cantona and Calzaghe is that when they had achieved all they desired in their given sport, they were strong enough and honourable enough to walk away, leaving nothing but reputation and memories to be eulogised ad infinitum. These men will never be vilified in the press because ‘his legs have gone’.

Michael Schumacher, up until now, has found this status amongst sporting gods. His ruthless duels with Damon Hill, his infamous fight with Nigel Mansell, the seven world titles in a peerless reign of dominance, all part of a narrative to draw alongside and overtake the ghosts of racing past: Moss, Stewart, Senna, Lauder, Prost. If he returns to a team less competitive than the Ferraris he became accustomed to and who could only get this years world champion on the podium once in the second half of a title-winning season, how will he fare? For all the ability and skill he may or may not still possess, if the car ain’t fast, the car ain’t fast. Worse than that however, is if he makes a return to a potential podium challenging vehicle and can’t cut it. What if the few years spent as a guest on Ferrari’s pit wall, testing F1 prototypes and spending time with his young family have dulled the reactions, reduced the insatiable will to win at all costs, or simply reduced the willingness to take the risks involved when accelerating to 150mph directly towards a tyre wall? In either of these scenarios, the aura will be cracked. The myth a little less believable. The memories updated with pictures of a frustrated man, replacing those of the omnipotent deity.

Instinct tells me that there is no smoke without fire. I fully expect to witness one of the most heralded returns in the history of all sport and maybe this is what makes him a true sporting great; the willingness to take the risks others wouldn’t and the passion to succeed others can only dream of.

However the doubt remains that, above all else, Michael Schumacher is gambling with nothing but his own legacy.

Good Evening

November 18, 2009

The morning paper, without the paper

Filed under: Volleys — Tags: , , , , , , — richpye @ 18:39

The Times today announced their intention to press ahead with applying charges to their online news content, now expected in Spring 2010.

As part of a project Rupert Murdoch’s News International group has mooted for some time, The Times will, this spring, initiate changes to their online news website, in a bid to arrest the slump in hard copy media sales and cash in on the ever expanding influence and relevance of online media.  This, on top of Murdoch’s stated desire to remove his portfolio of publications from Google’s search index, threatens to change the way we view and pay for news in the 21st Century.

Online news sites, particularly those operated by the national daily press, have always seemed a little strange to me.  I have always found it peculiar that I can pick up a copy of The Times on the way to work and pay a pound for the privilege of having something tangible and physical in my hands (which will also invariably stain my fingers black, but that’s another post for another day) and which provides me with an informative outlook on the day’s news and events.  The online alternative however, means I can sit at my PC on my lunch break and view the exact same content, as well as content which did not make the final print run, articles from the previous day, week or month and of my own choice, all entirely for free (plus my fingers remain squeaky clean). Yes, online we have to put up with more advertisements, prompts for surveys, flashing banners etc etc, yet we don’t have to skip past the Court Circulars, turning page after page of appointments and job vacancies or simply just bypassing the articles which are of no interest. The online news experience, straight away is a more user-friendly, interactive and bespoke service which a newspaper will never be able to recreate, let alone better.

The sales of printed publications have also been in a steady, if unalarming, state of decline for some time now.  Roy Greenslade writes of national press circulation figures in his Guardian Blog;

“The monthly year-on-year drop comparing December 2008 to December 2007 was 4.5%.  That compares with 2% (2007-6), 3.2% (2006-5), 1.7% (2005-4), 3.2% (2004-3) and 3.8% (2003-2). Clearly, therefore, the downward trend is accelerating.”

In this time of recession the staple income of ad sales has also suffered, with rates also dropping and discounts becoming more commonplace.

So with the two key revenue streams of sales and advertising being adversely affected, and profits proving minimal at best in a time of a deep recession, thoughts invariably have turned to the currently (essentially) free-to-all domain that is the internet.  In an ideal world of a free, publicly funded press, both web and hard copy media would cost nothing to everyone.  In the real world of bottom lines, profit margins and market share, however, online news coverage was always going to be fair game.

Publishers are also not the only ones keen to cash in on this popular marketplace.  The UK’s Newspaper Licensing Agency (NLA), created in 1996 by the UK National Press to manage the collection of copyright fees from hard copy press, has recently announced that it intends, in 2010, to charge copyright license fees for the dissemination of online content as well.  The NLA licenses and charges companies (companies keen to know where and when their organisation is being mentioned in the media and who employ a Press Cuttings Agency (PCA) to carry out these searches) to receive, view and disseminate editorial content without the express permission of the specific publication and/or individual writer.  They are making a move into online content which, until the present-day, has been free for PCA’s to monitor and send to their clients.  This certainly indicates an increasing industry awareness of the lucrative and untapped nature of online news.

The  rise in influence and relevance of online and social media also appears to be a factor.  A recent story which caused massive distress and damage to the Labour Government was the Damian McBride affair, brought into the public domain, not by any of the traditional media outlets such as The Times, The Independent, The Telegraph… The Sun… but instead by an anonymous (at the time) blogger by the name of Guido Fawkes.  If it wasn’t for the blogging of the email smears story by Fawkes, the story could have potentially taken weeks more to hit.  With the increasing daily use of Facebook and Twitter and the savviness and willingness of users to interact online, stories such as the McBride affair, can become international news in hours and days rather than weeks and months and thus, become far more valuable.

As I mentioned earlier, the online experience of news seems to know no bounds and it now seems the time is nigh for the publishers and contributors to reap the rewards.

Whilst they are yet to outline a definitive pricing model for the application of these charges, James Harding, Editor of The Times, has stated that he expects to ”rewrite the economics of newspapers”.  This bold move could backfire, with readers flooding to free sites and advertisers withdrawing their business to focus on higher opportunities-to-see market places, however it would appear more as a positive shift in the landscape.  A chasm has been slowly opening and swallowing the traditional hard copy press institutions as we become more digitalised in everything we do. With such monolithic, political institutions such as News International (NI) at the helm however, the digital age and online news coverage has provided the perfect mountain range to rise in its stead.  Where NI tread, others are sure to follow, with readers being thus forced back to the traditional cumbersome daily paper from their comfort zones of archives and searches, or, biting the bullet, paying a pound for a days access to all the content they desire and remaining happy and contented at their desks, eating their cheese and tomato sandwiches and reading what they want to read, from whenever they require, in a clean, interactive format.

I suspect my pound will mostly go towards an online day pass.  There still is, for me at least, not many more pleasing yet utterly disposable object however, than a fresh copy of The Times.  Inky fingers and all.

Good Evening

November 17, 2009

Problems & Solutions

Filed under: Headers, Volleys — Tags: , — richpye @ 22:33

A man (not I) once said;

“You can be part of the problem, or part of the solution.

I, on the other hand, think that if you put your mind to it, you can be part of both.

(sic. Modern Family, HBO/Sky1)

I think this sums up quite well what I hope to achieve herein.

Why start a blog? Why give my opinion to strangers who have no more desire to invest in my musings than I theirs?

The same reason we strike up conversation with the man next to us who’s also just been ignored by the angry-looking waitress at the bar of The Lion.

Part of the problem.

The same reason we say, when [said] angry-looking waitress utters in our direction, that welcoming drawl “whaddyawuntthen?”, “Oh, I think this guy was first actually”.

Part of the solution.

Only problem with this solution is that the guy I’ve struck up a conversation with can’t stick two words together, gets his 8 pints of Snake Bite (for him and his girlfriend, I can only assume) and stalks off forgetting to return the favour by mentioning that “this guy’s after me, love.”

Part of the problem, part of the solution.

An issue which unites or an action which divides, seems very much a reason to add to these pages.

Hence Headers & Volleys.

Headers: Fact, news; items of interest

Volleys: Opinion, debate; items of conflict

Good Evening

Blog at WordPress.com.